preaching

Why Do We Neglect the Bible? (and what to do about it)

July 3, 2018 By Daniel Im

“The Bible ought not to be torn limb from limb, and its joints hung up like meat in the shambles.”

This last week, as I was writing a sermon on the end of Colossians, I came across these stark words from Charles Spurgeon, aka the Prince of Preachers. It’s from a sermon that he preached on December 14, 1873. Let’s keep on reading,

Beyond all other books it will bear dissection, for it is vital in every sentence and word. Since it is a mosaic of priceless gems, you will be enriched even if you extract a jewel here and there, but to behold its divine beauty you must contemplate the mosaic as a whole. No idea of the magnificent design of the entire Scriptures can enter the human mind by reading it in detached portions, especially if those separated passages are interpreted without reference to the run of the writer’s thoughts. Let Scripture be read according to the rules of common sense and that will necessitate our reading through a book and following its train of thought. Thus shall we be likely to arrive at the mind of the Holy Spirit. I say this because I may have to disturb your idea of the meaning of a passage of Scripture this morning, for a short time. But you need not be alarmed, for after I have disturbed, I shall, most probably, confirm it. I shall pull down to build up again.

The Bible is a wonderful gift from God. It’s His words to us. Simultaneously it’s history, poetry, wisdom, prophecy, and the Gospel. It’s not lacking in anyway, and does not have to be added to. It’s complete, never changing, and irreplaceable.

The Bible is a mosaic of priceless gems.

Click To Tweet

So why is the Bible so neglected?

Why do almost nine out of ten American households own a Bible, but more than half have read little or none of it? Why do “less than a quarter of those who have ever read a Bible have a systematic plan for reading the Christian scriptures each day”? And why is it that “a third of Americans never pick it up on their own”?

3 Ways to Normalize Bible Reading

November 14, 2017 By Daniel Im

Growing up, my favorite sermons were the ones where the preacher would get into the Greek or Hebrew and explain to us common folk what the Scriptures really meant.

In the Greek, this word is translated, pistis, and it means…

In the Hebrew, this word is translated as hesed, and it means..

Those were the moments where I felt like I was being fed “meat,” rather than “milk.” Those were the moments when my ears perked up. Those were the moments that made the sermon worth it…since I couldn’t get that sort of insight on my own. Reading the Scriptures in the “simpleton language” of English just didn’t cut it. Unless I knew the Greek or the Hebrew, I could never attain the level of depth in my relationship with God that my pastor had.

How did that last paragraph make you feel? Did something feel off to you?

In my pastor’s pursuit to be exegetically sound, and to provide “meat,” depth, and insight into the Scriptures, he unintentionally made the Scriptures inaccessible to the congregation.

Without verbally saying it aloud, he was basically saying that the English language wasn’t adequate to understand the true intent of the Scriptures. In his desire to be helpful and shepherd us toward spiritual growth, he was actually going against the point of the Reformation—to make the Scriptures accessible to all.

The point the Reformation? To make the Scriptures accessible to all.

Click To Tweet

Ouch.

Who else is guilty of this? As a pastor myself, I know I am…

The End of the Sermon?

April 4, 2017 By Daniel Im

“Online news isn’t journalism; it’s copy-and-paste from the newspaper.”

Guess what year that was written? …in the year 2000…🎶🎤🎹

There used to be a day when getting your news online carried this sort of stigma. To the public, it was seen as sub-par, less than adequate, mediocre, and untrustworthy. To journalists and news organizations, it was an after-thought.

All of this began to shift in 1998 when the Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky scandal first broke on The Drudge Report (an Internet news aggregation site) before any newspaper was able to publish it.

Now fast forward 19 years to March 26, 2017, and at 8:36 am, the same thing happened when two young girls weren’t allowed on a United Airlines flight because they were wearing leggings. Yes you heard me…leggings. It’s not like they had burned their bras or were wearing mini-skirts, short-shorts, or anything revealing by any means.

Well, as you’d expect, within minutes a Twitter storm erupted. By the time United “officially” responded and explained why those girls weren’t allowed to board, the damage had already been done. And when this story hit print the next day, it was considered old hat.

In a day and age when seconds matter in the world of information and breaking news, how do newspapers still exist?

How are they even still profitable? Aside from shrinking margins, high fixed costs, and declining advertising revenue, how are they even still relevant?

The front page of a newspaper was the viral Instagram and the trending Tweet of ol’—it was the breaking news and the historic story. That’s where we got the phrase, “Read all about it! Get your paper, and read all about it!”

It’s what many looked forward to in the morning. It was regular reading over breakfast, during the commute to work, and over the water cooler. However, today, it’s nothing but a reminder of what already happened. It’s something we already knew about within minutes, if not seconds of the actual event.

Are live sermons still relevant?

Is it possible that the traditional live sermon could go the way of the newspaper?

There used to be a day when the only way you could hear a sermon was by going to a local church. Sunday morning, Sunday evening, and Wednesday nights were the typical selection. If you were a part of a Korean church that held early morning prayer, then you could get your prepared biblical exposition every morning before work.

But what about today? Well, as churches continue to cut traditional programming (often starting with their Sunday evening service) and put their sermons online, do you think a day is coming when the Sunday morning live sermon could face the same fate as the newspaper?